Six Sigma Virtual Catapult with Excel

 


A wooden catapult has been widely used in Six Sigma education to illustrate multiple factor process variation and optimization.

We will use a catapult simulator with 4 factors to practice:

    • Process variation
    • Linear regression
    • Response surface analysis
    • Process optimization
This will be done using Microsoft Excel Analysis and Solver


Download this Excel simulator Catapult.xlsx from Google Drive and run it in your PC.
Select sheet Catapult


Working Plan

1. What factors affect distance?

2. What values of these factors to achieve maximum distance?

3. Run a full factorial set of experiments with 4 central points

4. Can you detect curvature? Is this linear model valid?

5. Run response surface experiments to find a better model

6. What is the resulting formula to estimate distance as a function of factors?

7. What values give us the maximum distance?

8. Make 10 replicates to estimate the confidence interval of the distance

9. Calculate the angle a to hit a target of 20 with maximum or minimum values of f, m and l


Possible Factors Affecting Range

We have 4 factors that might affect distance d:

f:    spring force

m:   payload weight

a:    release angle

l:     lever length

Experimentation Levels

Based on previous experience we have selected the following experimentation levels for each factor:


Factorial Experiment Design

First we want to know which of these factors affect the range d.

We will start with a full factorial design with the 4 factors adding 4 central points.

See article  Design of Experiments (DOE) with Excel

In sheet Coding  we obtain the uncoded values from the coded design matrix.




Run the Experiments

We will now simulate the running these experiments entering the uncoded matrix (copy the matrix and paste ONLY VALUES) in our simulator in sheet Catapult:


Factorial Analysis



We obtain:




Curvature

The R square value of 0.68 indicates that this linear mathematical model only explains 68% of the variation.

On the other hand the p-values of the four factors below 0.05 indicate that they all have a significant effect on the distance d. 




Plotting distance as a function of angle we see that the central point is out of line with the extremes: the relationship between distance and angle is not linear. 

This invalidates our linear model: we will try a quadratic model with response surface design of experiments.

Response Surface Design


We will run a 4 factor CCD design in order to use the previous experiments already performed.
Sheet Response:


To the 16 full factorial experiments already performed we now add 8 additional star points and 7 central points to complete the response surface experiments.


Response Surface Analysis

We now compute the squares and interactions of factors for the analysis in sheet Response:

We do the regression analysis using d as an output and all factors, interactions and squares as inputs.

The result of the regression analysis in sheet Response:

We now have a good R square value of 91%

We will now remove non-significant squares and interactions (p > 0.05) and run the regression again in sheet Reduced:



The p-values for f and l are above 0.05 but their interactions are below 0.05 so they must remain.

The resulting distance estimate formula is:

d = 23 + 1.3 f -7.9 m +1.4 a -1.6 l -1.5 f*m + 0.3 f*l + 28 m*m 

Maximum Range

We will prepare the cells for Solver to calculate the optimal factor values to achieve maximum distance in sheet Reduced.

We prepare the yellow cells to contain the values of f, m, a, l that Solver will calculate to maximize distance d (R26).

Squares and interactions in column R are calculated with formulas from the yellow cells.

The formula for distance in R26 is = SUMPRODUCT(M17:M25 ; R17:R25):




We will ask Solver to maximize distance in R26 by changing the values in the yellow cells R18:R21.



We run Solver to obtain the values that maximize distance.

The maximum distance  of 59.6 is, therefore, achieved with:

f = 20 (maximum force)

m = 1 (minimum payload)

a = 60.6 degrees release angle

l = 10 (maximum lever length)


 Results Confirmation

We run 10 experiments all with these optimal values in sheet Confirmation:

The resulting confidence interval for the mean of these results is (68,75)

Check for normality of these results in sheet Normality:


The distribution of means follows a normal distribution.

The resulting confidence interval is (68,75) as seen before

With our fixed f, m and l values the relationship between angle and distance in sheet Max a is:


We confirm the maximum distance with an angle of 60º.

Hit Target 20

We now want to calculate the factor values to hit a specific target.

There are many combinations of f, m and l values that will allow us to achieve the target of 20 by changing the angle a. 

In sheet Target 20:

We fix f = 10, m = 2 and l = 10 and use Solver to calculate the angle a to hit the target d = 20



The resulting angle is a = 51.2

Average Confidence Interval

We replicate with this optimal angle in sheet Confirmation 20 and obtain the confidence interval in sheet Normality 20: 


Conclusions

  • The Six Sigma Catapult is a useful device to experiment process variation, Design of Experiments and multiple factor process optimization.
  •  Process simulation could be a useful alternative, when it is not possible to use an actual catapult.
  • The catapult may be simulated with Excel. 
  • Group work and discussion is still possible remotely, discussing with a video call.
  • Design of factorial experiments, and Response Surface analysis, may be done with Excel Data Analysis.
  • Excel Solver may be used to optimize the mathematical model with constraints.

Related Articles 
































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Design of Experiments (DOE) with Excel

Excel VSM Simulator

Response Surface Design Of Experiments with Excel